Comparison of Motion Response Characteristics of Tension Leg Platform Structure Threestar and Fourstar

Authors

  • Rafi Irsyad Syarief Department of Ocean Engineering, Institut Teknologi Kalimantan, Balikpapan, 76127, Indonesia
  • Luh Putri Adnyani Department of Ocean Engineering, Institut Teknologi Kalimantan, Balikpapan, 76127, Indonesia
  • Destyariani Liana Putri Department of Ocean Engineering, Institut Teknologi Kalimantan, Balikpapan, 76127, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35718/ismatech.v3i2.8481434

Keywords:

Tension Leg Platform, Pontoon Configuration, Motion Response, Free Floating, Six Degree of Freedom

Abstract

Tension Leg Platform (TLP) is a floating structure used for deep-sea oil and gas exploration with a tendon mooring system that maintains its stability. This study aims to compare the dynamic response of two TLP configurations, namely Threestar and Fourstar, during free-floating. Modeling is conducted numerically using ANSYS SpaceClaim and hydrodynamic simulation through ANSYS AQWA. The structural dimensions are modified from TLP A West Seno using displacement as validation. Environmental loading is based on wave, wind, and current data from the Makassar Strait waters. The simulation results show that the Threestar configuration has a higher Response Amplitude Operator (RAO) value in translational and rotational movements than Fourstar, except for heave movements where Fourstar is slightly more dominant. The difference in RAO values ​​reflects the effect of the number and configuration of pontoons on structural stability. Fourstar, which is more symmetrical to the X and Y axes, shows a more stable response. In addition, TLP structures tend to show better performance in longer wave periods. Thus, the Fourstar structure is more recommended as it provides higher stability in challenging sea conditions.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-09

How to Cite

Syarief, R. I., Adnyani, L. P., & Putri, D. L. (2025). Comparison of Motion Response Characteristics of Tension Leg Platform Structure Threestar and Fourstar. Indonesian Journal of Maritime Technology, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.35718/ismatech.v3i2.8481434